Within the past 10 minutes Saddam Hussain has been sentenced to death for Crimes against Humanity for his part in the deaths of 48 people in the Dujail region of Iraq.
Not really a suprise, even before Saddam was captured the Iraqi courts and the American Government were discussing his method death once he was brought to trial, so it seem something of a forgone conclusion that this sentence would be passed.
Throughout the 40s and 50s the former USSR were decried for their show trials of rebels against the regime. So why is it to the wider world, the trial of Saddam is seen as just another show trial with an enevitable end?
There is no doubt for the families of those who died in the Dujail massacare that justice has been done, but do the thousands of families of those victims who died in the Anzia (spelling?) massacare feel the same, if Saddam wasn't given the death sentence for this first trial then he would have gone onto face charges on this wider crime. So have these families had their justice?
However the point in peoples minds has to be has the justice system been seen to work in a fair and impartial way or are we dealing with a country which will never know how to have a fair system of justice? For so long Saddam ruled in the manner he wished rather than to the rule of law and now the occupying forces are in control is justice actually being done or is it being done just for the conveniance the western world rather than the Iraqi people.
There is no doubt however this verdict will see an increase in the insurgencey in Iraq wether its a tempory blip or a more long term one. Iraq is a country in turmoil and true justice can never really be done when there is no precident for it being done in the first place.
To me these Saddam trial are up there with the Soviet Show Trials in their ludricacy and total lack of true justice. Saddam may be a guilty man, but even a guilty man deserves a full and fair trial.
